Following his appointment as President of the company, a
contact tipped him off about a possible fraud involving the purchase for over
$1bn, of 3 small, obscure companies, which themselves had virtually no turnover.
As he pursued the story, and was
beginning to get close to the source of the problem, he was suddenly called
into a meeting with the Chairman, Kiku Kawa, his mentor and the man
responsible for his appointment. As he entered the Board room, Kawa was
sitting on one side of the table with a great platter of luxury sushi in front
of him; opposite, in front of Woodford’s seat, was a ‘manky’ tuna sandwich,
unadorned and just slapped on a plate.
The message, Woodford reflected, was that he was the ‘tuna sandwich’ of the
food chain.
Undeterred, he continued to ask questions relating to the fraud trying to resolve the issue in private, but, on failing to achieve anything, his investigations culminated in him presenting his evidence to the board and asking for the resignation of the Chairman. An extraordinary board meeting was called, and instead of acknowledging the case against Kawa, they fired Woodford.
The share price subsequently fell $7bn, 82% of the value of
the company was lost and yet the institutional shareholders did nothing about the
fraud or about Kawasan who continued as Chairman. When asked what he had learned as a result of
the affair, Woodford concluded:
“Most people don’t care a dot
about anyone else but themselves and their nuclear families and that surprised
me…after I was fired, people ran with the pack, with the new order and that
still haunts me today. Some of those colleagues
in America, the UK and Germany had held my babies in their arms, they’d gone on
holiday with me and there was no text message, they didn’t have to say
anything, just “how are you”. And that
has left me feeling rather jaundiced about human nature’
When the other guests on the show demurred, claiming that
this was an unnecessarily grim view of human nature, Woodford retorted, that
most people are never tested and that none of us know how we will react until we
are put to the test. When put to the
test his corporate ‘friends’ treated him as ‘persona non grata’ which, for
Woodford, was “very hard to describe, it’s a horrible thing to go through”.
At this point it would be appropriate to talk about forgiveness. But, something complex and profound happened to Woodford as a result of his experience. He doesn’t have to forgive just one person who wronged him – that would be relatively easy. He has to forgive ‘humanity’. He has seen through the veneer of human nature – he has seen our dark side – the instinct to self-protect and to sacrifice the ‘other’ in our own self interest. As a result of his experience he has lost his innocence; his view of human nature has changed and he has become cynical, upset and, I suspect, angry.
I have written about similar cases to Woodfords in my book
about leadership blind spots and I feel I understand a little about where he is
coming from. As Evan Davis and his
guests pointed out, people behave differently when things go wrong and when
they are under pressure. None of us know
how we would respond if a friend is sacked and we are made to feel that
contacting him or her would endanger our own careers and jobs. All of us have a dark side and none of us
know exactly when or where that dark side will emerge.
So rather than suggest Woodford ‘forgive’ those who wronged
him, I feel that we need to learn to forgive humanity and to forgive ourselves. The best way of doing that is to confront our
dark side, to acknowledge that the instinct to protect ourselves and to
sacrifice the other is deeply embedded in our psyches and to hope that when we
are tested we will not be found wanting.
And when the reality of humankind’s cruelty, selfishness, greed and
ruthlessness all gets unbearable, a period of silent reflection, in retreat
from the world, contemplating some of the beauty we have been gifted might help
to soften the pain:
The peace of wild things by
Wendell Berry
When despair grows in me
and I wake in the middle of the night at the least sound
in fear of what my life and my children's lives may be,
I go and lie down where the wood drake
rests in his beauty on the water, and the great heron feeds.
I come into the peace of wild things
who do not tax their lives with forethought
of grief. I come into the presence of still water.
And I feel above me the day-blind stars
waiting for their light. For a time
I rest in the grace of the world, and am free.
and I wake in the middle of the night at the least sound
in fear of what my life and my children's lives may be,
I go and lie down where the wood drake
rests in his beauty on the water, and the great heron feeds.
I come into the peace of wild things
who do not tax their lives with forethought
of grief. I come into the presence of still water.
And I feel above me the day-blind stars
waiting for their light. For a time
I rest in the grace of the world, and am free.
Very interesting article
ReplyDeleteYou make a great point that until we are tested we can't truly know how we will react. We can imagine how we hope we'd respond but none of us can be sure what the reality would be until the time. Would be interesting to know what made Michael Woodford different - what was it that enabled him to go against the pack and pursue a course of action he felt was right in spite of the reaction of others.
ReplyDeleteI am fascinated by this question. There is a great experiment conducted by Darley and Batson in a seminary in the US. A confederate of the experimenters feigns illness in the street and they then measure how many of the trainee priests stop to help. In the first condition, when they are not in a hurry, around 60% stop. In the second condition, when they are in a hurry, around 10% stop. This number, 10%, often occurs in these experiments - I have a personal theory that 10% of the population have extremely high altruism/integrity scores - but no scientific evidence to back it up as yet!
DeleteWhen I heard that story it had the additional, potentially apocryphal, element that in the second scenario they are late for a lecture on the meaning of The Good Samaritan.
DeleteI think there is another important element as well as high altruism/integrity at play here. If I am late for something or heading to be somewhere for some purpose then by stopping to do something else I am potentially letting down someone else or breaking a personal commitment that I have made previously. Whether it comes from a lack of regard for what others think or a willingness to deal with the fall out from failing to keep to my previous commitment, I think it takes courage to change the plan and stop. In other words as well as noticing that stopping would be a useful thing to do I also have to take the decision to act on that and change my plans.